Dead Reckoning Technology

Dead Reckoning is a positioning technique that calculates current location by using a previously determined position and advancing it based on known or estimated speeds over elapsed time.

Overview

Dead Reckoning determines position by calculating displacement from a known starting point using velocity, time, and direction data. In RTLS applications, it's often combined with periodic corrections from fixed reference points to prevent cumulative errors.

This approach is particularly valuable in environments where continuous tracking is essential but full infrastructure coverage is impractical or cost-prohibitive, such as multi-floor buildings, underground facilities, or large open spaces.

Key Specifications

  • Sensors:IMU (accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer)
  • Accuracy:1-5% of distance traveled (standalone)
  • Range:Unlimited (degrades with distance)
  • Update Rate:10-100 Hz
  • Power Consumption:Medium (sensor dependent)
  • Infrastructure:Minimal (sparse anchors for correction)

How Dead Reckoning Works for RTLS

Inertial Navigation

Dead reckoning uses inertial measurement units (IMUs) containing accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers to detect movement. Accelerometers measure linear acceleration, gyroscopes track rotational movement, and magnetometers provide heading information. These measurements are integrated over time to calculate displacement from a known starting point.

Hybrid Correction

To prevent cumulative errors, dead reckoning in RTLS is typically combined with periodic position corrections from fixed reference points (anchors). When a tag or device comes within range of an anchor, its position is recalibrated. This hybrid approach maintains continuous tracking while limiting error growth.

Advantages & Limitations

Advantages
  • Continuous positioning without constant infrastructure coverage
  • Reduced infrastructure requirements and associated costs
  • Functions in challenging RF environments (tunnels, metal structures)
  • Effective for tracking across multiple floors and elevations
  • High update rates for real-time movement tracking
  • Privacy-preserving (no constant external signals required)
Limitations
  • Cumulative error growth without periodic corrections
  • Sensor quality significantly impacts accuracy
  • Requires sophisticated algorithms for optimal performance
  • Motion pattern sensitivity affects accuracy
  • Initial position and orientation must be known
  • Higher computational requirements than simple proximity systems

Industry Applications

Manufacturing Applications
Dead reckoning enhances tracking in complex industrial environments.

In manufacturing facilities, dead reckoning combined with sparse RTLS anchors enables continuous tracking of assets, vehicles, and personnel across large factory floors with minimal infrastructure. This approach is particularly valuable for tracking forklifts and automated guided vehicles (AGVs) in environments with metal structures and changing layouts.

The technology helps optimize material flow, reduce search times for critical tools, and improve safety by maintaining position awareness even in areas with poor signal coverage.

Common Use Cases:

  • Forklift and AGV tracking in large facilities
  • Tool and equipment positioning
  • Worker safety in signal-challenged areas
  • Material flow optimization
  • Multi-level factory tracking

Key Benefits:

  • Continuous tracking with minimal infrastructure
  • Reduced search time for critical assets
  • Improved safety in RF-challenged environments
  • Enhanced process visibility
  • Lower total cost of ownership

Mini Case Studies

Multi-Floor Hospital Tracking
Regional Medical Center

A 450-bed hospital implemented a hybrid dead reckoning system with strategic UWB anchors to track 3,000+ mobile medical devices across 8 floors. The system maintained continuous tracking in elevators, stairwells, and RF-challenging areas like MRI suites.

Equipment search time decreased by 73%, while infrastructure costs were 42% lower than a traditional full-coverage RTLS. Staff reported higher satisfaction with equipment availability, and the hospital achieved ROI within 11 months through improved asset utilization.

Warehouse Vehicle Tracking
Global Distribution Company

A distribution company deployed dead reckoning with sparse BLE anchors to track 75 forklifts across a 320,000 sq ft multi-level facility. The system maintained continuous positioning during vertical movement between floors and in areas with metal racking.

Operational efficiency improved by 18% through optimized routing and resource allocation. The company reduced infrastructure costs by 65% compared to traditional RTLS while achieving 2-3 meter accuracy throughout the facility. The system integrated with their warehouse management system for real-time optimization.

Implementation Considerations

Infrastructure Requirements
  • Inertial measurement units (IMUs) in tracked devices
  • Strategic anchor placement at key locations
  • Calibration zones for initial positioning
  • Server infrastructure for data processing
  • Network connectivity for anchor communication
  • Software platform with sensor fusion capabilities
Deployment Best Practices
  • Conduct thorough site survey for anchor placement
  • Place anchors at decision points and high-traffic areas
  • Implement regular calibration procedures
  • Use map constraints to improve accuracy
  • Select appropriate motion models for tracked objects
  • Tune algorithms for specific environment conditions
Common Challenges
  • Sensor drift between anchor corrections
  • Initial position acquisition reliability
  • Algorithm tuning for different movement patterns
  • Integration with existing systems
  • Battery life management for mobile devices
  • Maintaining accuracy during rapid movements

Technology Comparison

FeatureDead Reckoning + AnchorsUWBBLEWi-Fi
Infrastructure DensityLow (sparse anchors)High (dense anchors)Medium-HighLow-Medium
Typical Accuracy1-3m (varies with time since correction)10-30cm1-3m3-5m
Continuous TrackingYes (between anchors)Only in coverage areasOnly in coverage areasOnly in coverage areas
Power ConsumptionMedium-HighMediumLowHigh
Infrastructure CostLow-MediumHighMediumLow (if existing)
Multi-Floor TrackingExcellentLimitedLimitedLimited
RF Interference ResilienceHighMediumLowLow
View all RTLS technologies →

Future Trends

Technological Advancements
  • MEMS Sensor Improvements: Higher quality, lower cost inertial sensors reducing drift and extending tracking duration
  • AI-Enhanced Motion Models: Machine learning algorithms improving dead reckoning accuracy for various movement patterns
  • Opportunistic Anchoring: Using dynamic objects with known positions as temporary anchors for correction
  • Edge Computing Integration: More sophisticated algorithms running on low-power edge devices for better real-time performance
Market Evolution
  • Hybrid Solutions: Increasing integration of dead reckoning with other technologies for comprehensive coverage
  • Collaborative Positioning: Multiple devices sharing position information to improve collective accuracy
  • Context-Aware Algorithms: Using environmental context and activity recognition to enhance positioning accuracy
  • Standardization: Development of industry standards for dead reckoning integration with RTLS systems

Learn More About Dead Reckoning Technology

Unbiased Guidance

Need help determining if Dead Reckoning is the right technology for your RTLS project?

RTLS Alliance Practitioners can provide personalized guidance based on your specific requirements.

Ask an Alliance Member

Frequently Asked Questions About Dead Reckoning

Frequently Asked Questions

Dead Reckoning is a positioning technique that calculates current location by using a previously determined position and advancing it based on known or estimated speeds over elapsed time and direction. In RTLS applications, it typically uses inertial measurement units (IMUs) containing accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers to detect movement. These measurements are integrated over time to calculate displacement from a known starting point, with periodic corrections from fixed reference points to prevent cumulative errors.

Dead Reckoning accuracy varies significantly based on several factors: the quality of the inertial sensors used, the frequency of position corrections, and the movement patterns being tracked. Standalone Dead Reckoning typically experiences error growth of 1-5% of distance traveled. However, when combined with periodic corrections from technologies like BLE, UWB, or WiFi, accuracy can be maintained at 1-3 meters indefinitely. The error accumulation rate is also affected by movement type, with more dynamic movements generally causing faster error growth.

Dead Reckoning offers several key advantages for RTLS: continuous positioning without constant infrastructure coverage; reduced infrastructure requirements and associated costs; effective functioning in challenging RF environments like tunnels and metal structures; reliable tracking across multiple floors and elevations; high update rates for real-time movement tracking; privacy-preserving operation with no constant external signals required; and the ability to bridge gaps between coverage zones of other positioning technologies. These benefits make it particularly valuable for complex indoor environments with limited infrastructure.

Dead Reckoning has several limitations: cumulative error growth without periodic corrections; significant dependency on sensor quality for accuracy; requirement for sophisticated algorithms for optimal performance; sensitivity to different motion patterns affecting accuracy; need for known initial position and orientation; higher computational requirements than simple proximity systems; and challenges in distinguishing between similar movements in different locations. These constraints make standalone Dead Reckoning unsuitable for long-term tracking without complementary positioning technologies for periodic correction.

Dead Reckoning typically integrates with other RTLS technologies in a complementary hybrid approach: sparse anchor points using technologies like BLE, UWB, or WiFi provide periodic absolute position corrections; Dead Reckoning provides continuous tracking between these correction points; sensor fusion algorithms combine the data streams with appropriate weighting; map constraints can be applied to improve accuracy by eliminating impossible paths; and machine learning techniques can be used to recognize and correct for systematic errors. This hybrid approach leverages the continuous tracking capability of Dead Reckoning while preventing unbounded error growth through strategic correction points.